Exploring Venture Capital Trends in Emerging Technologies: Expert Insights

Open discussion with INPHO Venture Summit

Inpho Venture Summit 2024

Exploring Venture Capital Trends in Emerging Technologies: Expert Insights

Inpho Venture Summit 2024

Open discussion with INPHO Venture Summit

Venture Capital Trends in Deep Tech

We are delighted to share with you the podcasts covering topics that caught our attention. Indeed, explore the latest venture capital trends and gain valuable tech investment insights and discover strategic startup funding strategies and emerging technology investments shaping the future of innovation-driven venture capital through exclusive interviews with pioneering industry leaders, providing a comprehensive view of the evolving landscape.

Join this exclusive discussion on deep tech investment trends with Eric Benhamou, Founder and General Partner at Benhamou Global Ventures, a leading deeptech fund active both in Silicon Valley and Europe. Confirm your attendance by here.

Click on one of the links below to discover their insights:

What's next to invest in Deeptech in 2025?

Discussion with Eric Benhamou, Founder and General Partner at BGV

What's Next to Invest in Deep Tech in 2025?

Benhamou Global Ventures is a leading fund with + $2 BN raised, more than 50 companies in portfolio. Eric Benhamou, former CEO of 3Com and Palm Pilot, with 8 IPOs and 37 M&As under his belt, is looking for this discussion and will share his insights on the most promising deeptech investment opportunities in 2025 and beyond. Eric brings a unique perspective on emerging trends and strategic opportunities.

As a follow-up to the INPHO® Venture Summit discussions on What’s next to invest in DeepTech?, we have identified topics to be challenged.  

  • AI and the impact of Chinese developments like DeepSeek, a challenge to U.S. dominance and a game-changer for Europe?
  • Climate and biodiversity investments, where are the best opportunities in today’s geopolitical landscape?
  • High-potential verticals, which sectors hold the greatest promise for growth and innovation?

The discussion was introduced by Géraldine Andrieux, who set the stage by providing context for the conversation and explaining its relevance. Both she and Eric Benhamou play active roles on the editorial committee of the INPHO Venture Summit, helping to shape crucial conversations about the future of deep tech investment. She acknowledged Eric’s presence and the pleasure of having him taking part to this conversation.

She also extended a warm welcome to all the participants, with a special mention of François Breniaux from Supernova Invest, Christian Claussel from Ventech VC, Emmanuel Daugeras from Karista VC, Marc Lambrechts from Capricorn Partners, Anne Lebreton-Wolf from ALW Finance & Innovation and Rémy de Tonnac from ETF Partners. 

This conversation is the result of a discussion started during previous INPHO Venture Summit editions regarding the challenges of pinpointing ‘what’s next’ in deep tech investment. Just a few months ago, in October 2024, the last INPHO Venture Summit, focused on identifying the next big opportunities in deep tech. Since then, so much has unfolded. The objective of the discussion is not only to join INPHO participants but also key stakeholders from across the French and European innovation ecosystems, which promises a particularly exciting and diverse discussion.

  • The Future of Deep Tech Investment: Challenges in the U.S., China, and Europe 

Géraldine Andrieux: Eric, could you share your thoughts on what’s next for deep tech investment? Given our discussions at INPHO and the rapid evolution of AI and other technologies, what are the key trends shaping the landscape? 

Eric Benhamou: Since our last discussion in Bordeaux, one of the most significant developments in AI has been the introduction of the DeepSeek-R1 model in January. This was a major milestone for several reasons. 

First, it marks a breakthrough from a Chinese company, demonstrating deep innovation not just in software but also in hardware. It reinforces the idea that simply increasing computing power isn’t enough to drive AI forward; smart innovation in architecture plays an equally crucial role. DeepSeek has delivered a significant leap in performance while simultaneously reducing costs, proving that strategic advancements can be just as powerful as raw computational force. 

Another key factor is DeepSeek’s commitment to open-source AI. By making its model open-weight, DeepSeek is accelerating AI deployment, particularly in enterprise applications. This isn’t an isolated case. In recent weeks, we’ve seen similar or even greater advancements from Chinese tech giants like Alibaba and Baidu. 

This underscores the intensifying global competition in AI, with the U.S., China, and Europe all vying for leadership. China’s research ecosystem, despite restrictions on NVIDIA’s most sophisticated GPUs, has produced world-class advancements. Instead of using H100 GPUs, they have worked with H800 chips, which have lower chip-to-chip bandwidth but have compensated through algorithmic improvements such as quantization and reinforcement learning with reduced human input. Overall, these developments are significant and signal a positive trajectory for AI innovation worldwide.  

Rémy de Tonnac: However, Europe, has yet to fully position itself. While companies like Mistral AI show promise, large-scale collective investments similar to an “Airbus of AI” have not materialized. This leaves Europe at a competitive disadvantage compared to the U.S. and China.

  • Is DeepSeek a scam or a real game changer?

Rémy de Tonnac: A few weeks after the DeepSeek “tsunami,” have we started to understand if the DeepSeek architecture design is indeed significantly different from what has been done before? Does it inherently offer a huge advantage? 

Eric Benhamou: There’s broad agreement that the innovations introduced by DeepSeek represent a high-quality breakthrough, reflecting the caliber of their scientists. The innovations fall into two categories: hardware and software. 

On the hardware side, the key focus is finding ways around the limitations of not having access to the latest GPUs, particularly when it comes to chip-to-chip bandwidth. DeepSeek’s approach to reducing the amount of data traffic between chips is a key innovation. One such technique is quantization, which allows for faster matrix multiplications, core to AI processes, by reducing the precision of calculations. Essentially, you can drop off the last few digits in calculations, cutting down on computational cost and data movement without sacrificing significant accuracy. This drastically reduces the cost of compute and sidesteps the need for advanced chips. 

On the software side, DeepSeek has made significant strides in training efficiency. Training with human feedback (like reinforcement learning) is expensive, so finding ways to reduce the need for extensive human input can save considerable costs. DeepSeek has excelled at this, and much of their software innovation has been published in research papers. The great thing is that these software techniques are available for anyone to use. The hardware innovations are proprietary, but the software advancements are open for the industry. 

I think this is a step-function innovation for the AI field, and I believe it will benefit the industry overall. I haven’t looked deeply into the more recent Chinese models from Alibaba and Baidu, but I suspect their approaches are similar, given the competitive landscape. 

Christian Claussel: There has been some controversy surrounding DeepSeek, with questions about whether it truly lives up to expectations. Some initial skepticism impacted stock markets, but the concerns seemed to fade over time. 

Eric Benhamou: DeepSeek is definitely not a scam and should be taken very seriously. Their team consists of top-tier, highly reputable researchers, and their work has been peer-reviewed. However, there have been discussions about whether some of their training data was acquired under questionable circumstances. In China, where copyright laws are less strict, data access can be more flexible, which might give them an advantage in training efficiency. 

What’s also notable is how DeepSeek has been perceived as a real competitive threat. Companies like OpenAI have reportedly sought legal measures to limit its distribution, which is a strong indication that they see it as a viable rival. Rather than blocking access, it would be more constructive for OpenAI to highlight why their model is superior, but instead, we’re seeing restrictions on DeepSeek models entering the U.S. market. This underscores the global battle for AI dominance.

  • Sovereignty and Geopolitics in AI Development 

Anne Lebreton-Wolf: In today’s geopolitical landscape, Sovereignty in AI is a growing concern, more critical than ever. How do you see this shaping AI development? 

Eric Benhamou: AI sovereignty is crucial. Training advanced models requires access to vast datasets. China enjoys a strategic advantage here, as its regulatory environment allows nearly unrestricted data access. Meanwhile, strict copyright laws in the West significantly increase training costs. 

This naturally raises sovereignty concerns: If AI is truly a matter of national security and economic independence, as many believe, then placing such high costs on model training in the West could drive innovation elsewhere, potentially making us dependent on AI systems developed under entirely different values and biases. 

Then there’s the question of regulation. In Europe, for example, the EU AI Act introduces strict compliance requirements for high-risk AI systems. While well-intentioned, some argue that these regulations stifle innovation and impose unnecessary costs too early, which could further disadvantage European AI players. 

At the same time, the global AI landscape is becoming increasingly fragmented. Rising trade barriers and geopolitical tensions are leading to isolated AI ecosystems in the US, Europe, China, and other regions. As a result, companies may find it easier—or simply more cost-effective—to train their models in jurisdictions with fewer restrictions, which could influence the way AI develops worldwide. 

Ultimately, while everyone agrees that AI is one of the most critical technological innovations of our generation, the landscape is far from even. Sovereignty in AI is about much more than just technological leadership—it’s about economic resilience, security, and control over the future of intelligence itself.

  • The Rise of Agentic AI and Its Applications 

Géraldine Andrieux: AI is evolving rapidly, and we’re seeing the emergence of agentic AI. Eric, could you explain why this is significant? 

Eric Benhamou: Agentic AI refers to models that can reason, set goals, break them down into manageable steps, and determine the best course of action through chain-of-thought reasoning. This evolution enables AI-driven agents to go beyond automation; they can interact with existing IT systems, access databases, and participate in process automation—not in a rigid, robotic manner, but with adaptive, reasoning-based intelligence. 

This transformation was already underway, but the acceleration of AI models, now cheaper, more accessible, and increasingly capable, has made agentic AI even more viable. This creates a landscape where AI agents and human agents collaborate. AI agents will be auditable. We can track what they do, when they access data, and how they use it. This transparency is crucial for enterprise adoption. 

Emmanuel Daugeras: Today, most large language models rely on statistical pattern recognition rather than true understanding of the physical world. There’s growing interest in “physically informed machine learning,” where AI derives differential equations from physical observations. Do you see this as the next big disruption in AI? 

Eric Benhamou: Absolutely. Real-world models, those that reflect the physical environment—are key to advancing AI, particularly in robotics. The paradox is that while AI can now solve complex mathematical problems at a PhD level, it still struggles to manipulate objects as well as a toddler. A three-year-old can handle objects with greater dexterity than the most advanced robots today. 

This capability gap needs to be closed. Integrating real-world models will be crucial for AI to navigate and interact with its environment more effectively. Back in the 1960s, people envisioned household robots capable of handling daily chores. Yet, even now, we lack robots that can load a dishwasher without breaking plates. This highlights the limitations of current AI and the need for more advanced real-world learning approaches. 

Rémy de Tonnac: I completely agree. While the big infrastructure plays are largely dominated by tech giants, the real opportunity for VCs lies in applications leveraging agentic AI to drive productivity gains across industries. 

Eric Benhamou: While AI remains a major focus, other deep-tech areas like space and defense are becoming increasingly important. In Europe, significant investments are being directed toward defense, particularly in drone warfare strategies and fleet coordination. Innovations in autonomous systems are shaping modern military tactics, making this a key area for technological advancement. 

Space tech is another rapidly evolving field. From reusable rockets to space-based materials research and cyber defense for satellite payloads, there are countless opportunities. Companies working on Space Situational Awareness (SSA) are tackling challenges like collision detection using AI-driven pattern mapping rather than traditional computationally expensive methods. 

Emmanuel Daugeras: We’re actively investing in dual-use space tech and defense infrastructure. The demand for AI-powered solutions in these areas is growing, and we’re seeing strong traction. The number of satellites is set to double within a few years, making space traffic management a critical challenge. 

Christian Claussel: One of our portfolio companies is developing a Eurocontrol-like system for satellites, helping to manage space traffic. As payloads increase, AI-driven solutions for collision avoidance will become essential. 

  • European and Global Competition in AI & Quantum Computing, Space Tech and Defense Innovation 

Rémy de Tonnac: From a VC perspective, we consider that quantum computing is probably the only area in deep tech where Europe has a real competitive edge. Google’s recent Willow announcement demonstrated a quantum leap—completing computations in five minutes that would take traditional supercomputers trillions of years. 

Quantum will revolutionize fields like materials science, chemistry, and genetics. While direct investments in quantum infrastructure may be beyond the typical VC horizon, the real opportunity may be in developing the “picks and shovels”. In quantum computing, this could mean developing the tools and software that will accelerate its adoption. 

What areas of deep tech hold the most promise for European competitiveness according to you? 

Eric Benhamou: Quantum computing is indeed one such area where Europe has a competitive edge. While AI remains a major focus, other deep-tech areas like space and defense are becoming increasingly important. In Europe, significant investments are being directed toward defense, particularly in drone warfare strategies and fleet coordination. Innovations in autonomous systems are shaping modern military tactics, making this a key area for technological advancement. 

Space tech is another rapidly evolving field. From reusable rockets to space-based materials research and cyber defense for satellite payloads, there are countless opportunities.  

Emmanuel Daugeras: We’re actively investing in dual-use space tech and defense infrastructure. The demand for AI-powered solutions in these areas is growing, and we’re seeing strong traction. The number of satellites is set to double within a few years, making space traffic management a critical challenge. Companies working on Space Situational Awareness (SSA) for example are tackling challenges like collision detection using AI-driven pattern mapping rather than traditional computationally expensive methods. 

Christian Claussel: One of our portfolio companies is developing a Eurocontrol-like system for satellites, helping to manage space traffic. As payloads increase – the fleet estimated around 35,000 satellites today is expected to double in just three or four years – AI-driven solutions for collision avoidance will become essential.

  • Investment Strategies in AI: Infrastructure vs. Applications 

Christian Claussel: At Ventech, rather than predicting the next big AI trend, we focus on what AI is already doing today. AI isn’t a sudden revolution—it’s been evolving for decades. I remember visiting a Fraunhofer Lab in 2001 where AI research was already well underway. What has changed is that computing power has finally caught up, allowing AI to reach its full potential. The key question for us is: where do we invest? In infrastructure, software, or new algorithms? 

Eric Benhamou: As a VC, we don’t play in the massive infrastructure investment space, so we focus on high-value applications. For example, we wouldn’t make a $10 billion investment in a company like Mistral AI. It’s not that they aren’t competitive, but it’s simply not our swim lane. 

Our strategy centers on young companies that leverage AI to drive productivity gains. Right now, the biggest opportunity lies in agentic AI—models that use reasoning-based intelligence rather than just automation. These systems dynamically solve business problems, interacting with IT systems, querying databases, and adapting decisions in real-time. 

This creates a new landscape where AI and human agents collaborate. AI agents will be fully auditable, ensuring transparency in how they process data, making them viable for enterprise adoption. 

That said, France has some of the world’s best mathematicians, but too many focus on algorithmic research rather than business applications. The real opportunity is in companies applying AI to solve concrete business challenges rather than just developing theoretical models. This is where the best returns will come from.

  • Challenges and Opportunities in AI Monetization 

Emmanuel Daugeras: AI engines, to some extent, face the risk of becoming commoditized. AI engines consume massive amounts of energy and require huge capital expenditures. While they are transformative, how do you see real value being captured in AI? 

Eric Benhamou: That’s a fundamental question. What’s the return on AI? While AI innovation is unquestionable, monetizing it remains a challenge. 

In our view, the highest returns will come from AI-enabled applications and services. Infrastructure investments, though critical, are mainly reserved for well-funded firms. Companies like Mistral AI are exceptions—they are well-financed and have strong technology—but generally, infrastructure is a game for the tech giants. 

AI-enabled services, however, span across industries. Software development, for instance, is already experiencing major transformation. AI-powered coding assistance tools are boosting developer productivity to the point where some Silicon Valley companies have reduced engineering headcount, not due to financial struggles, but because AI has made development more efficient. 

Beyond software, customer-facing industries like financial services and insurance are seeing AI-driven automation in customer support and decision-making. These areas will yield the strongest AI-driven productivity gains and financial returns. 

  • Climate Tech and Energy Management 

Géraldine Andrieux: Climate tech is a critical area. How do you see AI playing a role in energy management? 

Eric Benhamou: I think there’s a crucial area of innovation here that many of us can agree on. We now need to harness a wide range of energy generation sources—solar, wind, nuclear (depending on the region), and others—into what we call virtual power plants. These virtual power plants are much more distributed and utilize various forms of energy generation and transportation. 

To better manage energy, we need software constructs to pull all of these resources together. For instance, a small community could aggregate all of its solar power from rooftops into one unit, and manage that alongside a larger physical plant somewhere in the region. This requires holistic management in the form of virtual power plants. 

AI is going to play a significant role here, improving utilization, balancing loads, and preventing energy waste. While there will certainly be innovations in physical energy generation and storage—areas we still know less about—what we understand more clearly is how to manage these systems efficiently. 

This intersection of AI and climate tech is going to be extremely interesting, and it’s something we’ll certainly be paying attention to. In Europe, particularly with the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and the subsequent shifts in energy sources, including the reevaluation of nuclear power, we’re seeing massive changes. This will result in a more diversified and distributed energy generation base. 

The only way to manage this smartly is through virtual power plants. So, there are a lot of interesting problems to solve here, and I think this area is a fertile ground for startups. 

Rémy de Tonnac:  One of the companies I’ve invested in is already implementing multiple AI models to balance grid efficiency. Quantum computing is also being explored for energy optimization, further enhancing the potential of AI-driven energy management. 

  • Data Governance 

Marc Lambrechts: A key focus here is data, especially data quality. In health applications, reliable data sources are crucial for AI systems. I’m particularly interested in Voxel Sensors, one of our portfolio companies, which is developing a hardware solution combining depth sensing with eye scanning to gauge intent or attention. They’re focusing on both hardware and software, ensuring data quality for future visual language models. While major AI players focus on compute power and data volume, Voxel is innovating in data quality, adding unique value. 

Eric Benhamou: I agree—data quality is essential for successful AI deployments. AI failures often stem from poor data curation, which hinders model training and insight generation. Improving data quality is critical for AI productivity gains. 

Beyond data quality, data governance is vital—ensuring secure access and combating issues like fake news. As the world faces more conflicts and cyber threats, the demand for sophisticated cybersecurity tools will grow. Some threats may involve disinformation campaigns or AI agents posing as humans to disrupt systems. 

The cybersecurity market will continue to expand, and while we may face competition in other sectors, its growth is assured. Additionally, space tech presents exciting opportunities, with France being a leader in space technology. 

 

  • VC Market Trends and Challenges 

François Breniaux: AI is taking up a significant portion of venture funding. What does this mean for other sectors? Can you be a successful investor today without investing in AI? 

Eric Benhamou: While AI dominates headlines, sectors like energy storage, materials science, and healthcare still offer strong investment opportunities. 

The VC market is still recovering from the 2022 downturn. In 2021, overinvestment led to inflated valuations and wasteful spending, followed by a sharp correction. 

Today, U.S. venture investment levels are similar to those of a decade ago, effectively wiping out years of growth. AI now takes the lion’s share of funding, leaving sectors like climate tech underfunded. However, I anticipate a surge in defense tech and cybersecurity investments in the coming years. 

 

Géraldine expressed her gratitude to Eric for his strong statement, emphasizing the importance of not only considering the technology but also the current state of the VC market and the wealth available in the venture capital world. She thanked Eric for his time and insightful contributions, noting how much they were appreciated. Géraldine also extended her thanks to all the participants for joining the conversation, highlighting how valuable the discussion had been. She concluded by mentioning that the next INPHO Venture Summit will take place in Bordeaux in 2026, inviting everyone to join what promises to be an excellent opportunity to connect with both investors and industry professionals. 

Counteract a monopolized world in deeptech

With George UGRAS, Managing director at AV8 Ventures and Christian REITBERGER, Partner at Matterwave Ventures

Christian Reitberger expresses concerns about a potential future dominated by Nvidia, where all computing services are provided by a few major companies, creating a monopolized and homogenous landscape. He advocates for a more diverse and colorful world, where system integration incorporates various technologies and architectures.

George Ugras shares optimism, citing historical precedents where dominant market shares have been challenged by innovative newcomers.

CHRISTIAN REITBERGER

I Try to think in worlds that I would not want to happen. And a world that I do not want to happen is one where all of compute is provided by Nvidia.

All the uses of compute are provided by companies like open AI, stability, Mistral, olive Alpha, that need billions of Euros per quarter to sustain themselves, which they shell out completely to Nvidia.

We should live in a much more colorful, heterogeneous, and much more differentiated world, where system integration happens, incorporating all of these ideas from Neuromorphic designs to new memory architectures, to ultra-low power architectures, which needs pretty smart buyers and pretty smart system integrators. 

And here I am now thinking about the likes of an ATOS or Cap Gemini, the people who are advising users that think about the supercomputing needs, their data center needs, of how Heterogeneous Compute should actually be made to work. And we don’t want this. 

We don’t want a monopolized world, which is being sustained by 5, 10 billion VCs that fund these mega cash consumers. We want to a more colorful world, and I think that is where we can then come in and invite the local corporate localizing 500 kilometers around Bordeaux, the corporate ecosystem as well.

 

GEORGE UGRAS

Yeah, I’m very optimistic that future is not going to happen Christian. In 1965, I think IBM’s market share was 65 percent, I remember those numbers, 65% market share in 1965. And, yeah, pretty much done.

There is some kid about a mile and a half from my house at Stanford right now, who’s a 19-year-old, and was thinking about how to make that happen to Google. It’s good.

 

There are alternatives to Costly LLMs and GPUs

 With Eric Benhamou, Founder at Benhamou Global Ventures

Eric Benhamou discusses two main themes highlighted by George and Christian during the conference: infrastructure and applications. He acknowledges the capital intensity associated with AI generation, raising concerns about industry concentration. Benhamou emphasizes the need for a debate on open versus closed models in AI development. He expresses optimism about the potential of scaled AI applications, particularly in vertical deployments, to disrupt industries. Benhamou also discusses the challenges and opportunities in infrastructure, including the shift from cloud-centric to edge and on-premise computing. He underscores the importance of robust cybersecurity measures against emerging threats posed by Gen AI. Overall, Benhamou anticipates fruitful discussions at the conference, particularly regarding breakthroughs in AI deployments and productivity enhancements.

ERIC BENHAMOU

So, first, I, like the way George has framed the two major tracks that we could use at the conference, less infrastructure, versus applications. And also, I like, very much, the important problem that Christian has posed, which is, I’m struck by the immense levels of capital intensity associated with this generation of AI, it’s absolutely mind boggling, the more than $100 million to train GPT4, Altman now wants to raise $7 trillion to build the next generation GPUs. For calibration, I think 7 trillion is more than twice the GDP of France, so nobody wants to live in a world that has this level of capital concentration, industry concentration. 

 

So, I think there’s going to be a big debate in the next few years about open versus closed, proprietary models, versus, open models. If you put something in the open, you have to be pretty comfortable that it is safe. So there has to be regulations around it. If you keep it proprietary, simply because it said you are not sure it is safe. Then we have big societal problems there. But I think the application track of the conference should be very interesting, because after, after Gen AI has come on the scene in full force with GPG and so on.

The anticipation of applications has risen and the return on AI expectations are extremely high. They are certainly very high. In the minds of investors, the last wave of earnings calls, every analyst is asking CEOs, what’s your return on AI investments? So I think, after a period of experimentation, in 2023-24, we’re going to have to see some scaled applications that disrupts and transform industries.

We’re investing in a few, and I’m sure that many, many panelists here are investing in others, but I’m very, very excited about the vertical AI space. And we’re going to start to see some low hanging fruits materialized at scale.

 

Gemma has no excuse me on the panel today, but I know she. She raised a share of effect. Coding at scale, enhancing productivity of knowledge workers, like Software engineers are using it, using Gen AI. I suspect the most promising applications at scale will be those that don’t bypass to humans, but Smit, unable to human to operate much, much higher level.

 

The way we think about this is exactly the same level sets we describe autonomous vehicles, so you have autonomy level 1, 2, 3, 4. And, same thing, I’ve seen what happened with enterprises. Enterprises will raise their level of autonomy. In other words, process automation, such that, human tasks for the elevated to much higher strategic levels, enabling more routine tasks to be handled by AI.  We are going to see this with, for example, customer support applications. Nobody likes to deal with call center operators. They prefer it to deal with people who have much more knowledgeable. This doesn’t mean that call centers will go away.

It does mean that call center operators will use Gen AI to be more efficient to dealing with other humans. I expect that’s a lot of legal projects handled by the General Counsel; will be sped up as a result of the immense capabilities of summarization that exists in Gen AI today?

 

The question that many of us, investors are faced with is: what is the right level investments in terms of magnitude and where do you place your investments in this space? Um, I don’t think anyone of us here on this panel has the wherewithal to invest in next generation of LLMs. That’s way too expensive or next gen GPUs.

 

On the other hand, if you invest in applications, and data and middleware, and RAG enhanced applications (Retrieval Augmented Generation), then you’re very likely to be able to create a complete solution that can be deployed at scale. Now, this exists in a wide variety of different industries and different investors have different specialties and they’ll be able to get returns in different industries. But I’m struck by the fact that, within a couple of year, we’re going to see a few breakouts applications at scale truly, illustrating, the potential.

Regarding the infrastructure, track that George and others talked about, it’s pretty clear that we’re going to have so many different forms of compute. They’re going to have to be put together in a logical set, architectures.

 

I’m struck by the fact that, in the first 15 years of this century, we witnessed a massive migration to the Cloud. Workflows went to the cloud and now we’re starting to see a counter stream where many workloads move back. They moved to the edge or the move back on premise. Sometimes Gen AI privacy concerns cause you to bring your workloads and the data back on premise. But I think This creates a very, very complex architecture with some edge. components and some cloud components from, some on premise components space components and I think there’ll be a very interesting debates about the most powerful architectures from edge to cloud. This morning just before the panel are recharged from our electric vehicle on a charger. And I came to realize this is not the same as the gas pump. This is a very smart edge device.

 

That knows a great deal about my consumption, that recognized my vehicle, it knows who I am, and potentially can be hacked to the point of destroying my vehicle. So, all of this made me think, OK, these are characters who require a very fine level of thinking.

Not just because of the balance of capital deployment, but because some architectures will be very vulnerable to a new generation of cyber-attacks, and others will be strong.

 

So, I think we’ll have, within the infrastructure track, I think we have some interesting debates about what is in the minds of attackers, whether they are state level actors or just hackers, when they’re confronted with this massively augmented attack surface?

I think Gen AI offers the possibility of extremely creative new attacks.

The same sort of social engineering attacks that we witness the last few years can be augmented dramatically with Gen AI.

 

That can deep fake humans, whether, in text conversation, voice, even image.

And we have to figure out a way to protect ourselves from these deep fake attacks, particularly in a world that is geopolitically more unstable.

 

So, it seems to me, we have some very, very interesting topics that we can fix across these two tracks.

And my personal interests, as I mentioned, in the contributions, is that I think the next couple of years, there’ll be some breakthrough returns in vertical AI deployments.

 

I don’t have a crystal ball good enough, clear enough to see, to know which ones but I’m placing my bets right now.

And I think the potential that gen AI at scale offers in terms of productivity boost is tremendous. So much more focus on an industrial and enterprise deployments and consumer deployments.

Energy, Defense Challenges in France & Europe: Spotlight on

With Christian REITBERGER, Partner at Matterwave Ventures

Christian Reitberger highlights two distinct aspects of France: its strong emphasis on nuclear energy and its successful collaboration between major defense players and the startup ecosystem. Christian Reitberger discusses the significance of nuclear energy in France, contrasting it with the preferences of other European countries like Germany. He suggests a lively debate on the necessity of nuclear energy, including Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), to meet energy demands, particularly for industries and data centers. Christian Reitberger also praises France’s model of collaboration between defense corporations and startups, noting its resemblance to successful practices in the United States. He emphasizes the uniqueness of these dynamics and suggests showcasing them at a French conference to provide valuable insights uncommon elsewhere.

CHRISTIAN REITBERGER 

I think there are two special traits of France, that are less represented in other eastern European countries, if we think about, one of our key European challenges, it is the very high energy costs that we have across the continent.

We all would agree that we bet on renewable energies on energy conversion storage, et cetera, et cetera, but in France, there is still this enormously strong lobby on nuclear and the Germans, for example, don’t understand the French at all, and why they like it so much.

 

So, to give some spice to the discussion, one question could be for a dependable baseload energy supply, with the still rapidly ramping electricity needs of reshored industry, and all those data centers all filled with NVIDIA GPUs. Is nuclear required and, do SMRs play a role.

 

I’m seeing that because you could invite ORANO or EDF. One could invite a couple of the SMR players to have a very lively discussion that you would not have anywhere else, nuclear is part of the energy mix of the future.

Just what food for thought. And the other one is different. Where we’re France, again, France has built a very, very close and tight relationship between the 5-6 major defense players that you have, SAFRAN, THALES, et cetera. And your startup in VC community. The rest of Europe is only catching up to that. I know continuously being invited by defense organizations, contractors that want to talk about dual use technologies and investing in dual use technologies.

 

France, as I learned a couple of weeks ago with an organization, with, one of the defense players is advanced here. You have seemingly you have found the model how to establish these collaborations between this open innovation platform, between your Big Defense Corporates and the startup community. Something that the US has done in the last 30 years and trained it extremely well. And we probably should learn.

 

And that is something that I think you could definitely demonstrate at the French conference; I’d be hard pressed to find more than three German participants who could talk with credibility about this topic. Yeah This would be special. You would not find this anywhere else.

GenAI: Addressing Infrastructure Needs for LLMs

with T.M. Ravi, founder at The Hive

T.M. Ravi presents four key discussion topics: Gen AI, climate, health (specifically cancer), and defense. He emphasizes that Gen AI and infrastructure extend beyond GPUs to include middleware, new-gen operating systems, and a data layer for Large Language Models (LLMs). Ravi underscores the importance of integrating infrastructure with applications and improving operations, coding, R&D, and design. He highlights the CEO of Nvidia’s statement that 30% of new code at Google is Gen AI-generated, indicating significant advancements. Discussions also touch on vertical and horizontal applications, providing ample material for debate.

T.M RAVI

Maybe, at least, I cheated I have maybe four topics. one is kind of more fundamental, which is Gen AI, that everyone’s spoken about, and then three sort of fundamental issues of our time, Climate, health cancer and defence. 

 

And on the Gen AI side, when it comes to infrastructure, it’s not just GPUs. So, it’s kind of the middleware that is going to be an emergence of new gen OS. There’s a whole new data layer to make the data ready for LLM. 

 

So, so there’s a lot to discuss in the infrastructure side, but also kind of, like the, structuring the judge propose of infrastructure plus applications and use cases, You know, the use cases applications, just operations, how operations going to fundamentally kind of improve. You know, there was discussion of coding. And so just R&D and design substantially changing.

 

I do largely agree with the quote from the CEO of Nvidia. Already we are hearing that 30% of the code at Google, the new code is Gen AI generated.

And it’s there’s just a lot going on there. And then the kind of vertical and horizontal applications. So, I think I think we have a good, good lot of meat here to debate.

Frugal and Edge Computing

With Dieter KRAFT, Director ar TRUMPF Venture and François TISON, General Partner at 360 Capital Partner

Francois Tison challenges Nvidia’s viewpoint, advocating for less compute power to sustain the planet. He sees a global shift towards frugal computing and believes Europe’s engineering strengths position it well for reindustrialization.

Dieter Kraft highlights the trend towards more efficient computing, particularly on the edge, and its potential to reshape architectures. Both identify these topics as key for discussion at the INPHO event, emphasizing collaboration to address challenges and seize opportunities.

FRANCOIS TISON 

I think the comment of the Nvidia guys is extremely arrogant and goes. You always complete, completely contrary to where, where we’re going. I mean, there’s no way in Hell, you know.

 

The more you increase the level of abstraction, the more compute you need to achieve simple tasks, and we don’t need more compute to achieve simple tasks. We need less compute to achieve simple tasks, because the, you know, our planet cannot sustain more compute. So, I think I do think that, know, as I said in the beginning, we did a lot of CLEAN TECHS a lot.

 

In 2005, 2010, it was really, it was not the right time. I think now, we’re in an environment where both the public and the public at both ends, so, the consumers and the politicians that represent the consumers, are now extremely aware, and are pushing us and are pushing everyone to move into more frugal, way of consuming, and more frugal, ways of computing, cleaner, electricity, recycling, et cetera, et cetera. 

 

Net zero, but beyond net zero or just a more frugal economy. Generally speaking, and we’re talking about the reindustrialization of Europe. I think those two subjects are linked, because in order to be more frugal to recycle more, we’re going to need to promote with smarter, smarter solutions, more engineering precision, engineering, stuff that mixes, engine, mechanic, precision mechanics, and Chemistry to produce, energy. Store energy, etcetera, etcetera. 

And this is one of the traditional strengths of Europe. There are two places in the world where, where these technologies are really strong. It’s Europe, around the Alps, Austria, Switzerland, Germany, Italy, France, that area, and Japan.

 

But, but, Europe is one of the strong areas in the world in terms of Engineering on these, on these topics, so, I do think that reindustrilaisation and going towards smarter, more efficient solutions and a more frugal economy, those are things that play to Europe strengths, and they go together, and I think these would be certainly, one of the interesting topics to cover. AT INPHO

 

 

DIETER KRAFT

But think it’s, it’s indeed interlinked between, let’s say, more computing but also more efficient computing.

which leads to a trend I tend to observe, not really sure if it’s already a trend, but what we see is, in different European countries. Netherlands and Christian knows about that or Dresden, efficiency on the edge, AI with components.

 

Also, hardware investments, which are more or less enabling on the edge, computing with much more efficiency, than in the past.

And that totally changes the architecture, or might change the architecture, And might also, let us think about what can we do in order to lower down the power consumption of distributed computing?

 

That is something where we have a deeper look. And I think it’s potentially a point for discussion in the INPHO event because that is, for me, something, what is really differentiating, and where we need syndicates. Which can go together that way, might be capital intensive, but it might be huge in the impact.

Evolving Computing Hardware

With Mathieu Costes, Airbus Venture

Mathieu Costes highlights the evolving computing landscape, emphasizing Quantum Computing and emerging hardware technologies. He discusses the importance of these advancements for Venture Capital investments, particularly in early-stage ventures. Costes also underscores the need for software orchestration in hybrid architectures and the urgency for sustainability in data center operations.

MATHIEU COSTES

One thing, one theme that I think, resonates with what we discussed over the last few minutes, is the world of compute because, obviously Quantum Computing and the world of hardware is evolving. Who will win the race between ion trap, neutral Atom, and others? I don’t know, but things are progressing heavily.

 

If you think compute, we’ll go to the known world of CPUs that measure low consumption CPUs of tomorrow, GPUs with the Nvidia story that could enable AI and other stuff, QPU is quantum, The world of Neuromorphic chips may come in, and finally mature.

Then we see the world of photonics, that may be much faster to move a photon, to save time when latency and speed is critical and Think about a DNA based storage and chemistry-based computing that could offer unprecedented, paralyzed tasks. So, the world of compute, starting with the hardware, to me, is the key element that is relevant for Venture Capital, especially in early stage.

 

And on that one, you could even see the world of software to orchestrate between Solver, and the world of workload scheduler in this new hybrid architecture, will have a key role to play. This is a this is a global problem. Because obviously we know the world of AI, which generate a huge volume of workload. between that one, weather forecasts, scientific computing and whatever computing to be needed tomorrow. I think we’ve got a very promising field to share news and hopefully, too, deploy more capital into in the coming years.

 

I would even mentioned, sustainability, how to have datacenters, CPU, GPUs, QPUs, that will not absorb the full volume of green electricity produced. You see what happened in Ireland a couple of months ago, they stopped the growth and expansion of the datacenters. Say, they are consuming 18% of the electricity generated into the country, which is exactly the same level of the energy electricity consumed by the citizens. So things will have to change.

Join our actions

Blumorpho works accross the whole blue economy ecosystem. We are happy to have you involved in more actions.

Inpho Venture Summit 2024

INPHO Venture Summit

A summit focused on investment, answering the question “What’s Next to Invest in Deep Tech?”

BLM Detection 6

Share & learn on our Platform

The first interactive platform that brings together innovation players around common interests.